1) if we CAN fully expand a sentence, before we test it for internal consistency, and we do not do so, then why? In other words, what is the informational content between an unexpanded sentence, and an expanded sentence? And why would we fail to expand a sentence that can be expanded?
I wrote at the end of Part 1, on another day I would cover off up the Existential Axiom, why Quantum Theory may be wrong, PLUS an earth shattering moral axiom, all leading up to why due-diligence to ensure truthfulness could be the greatest task one could take on… Today is another day. So, here it goes… Continue reading
Doing the due diligence to be truthful could be the single greatest act one can undertake. Part 1: What is truth?
A moment ago I was speaking with Joel on Facebook. I remarked that we can never claim to know truth, but rather only claim to have done the due diligence to be truthful (this is a Doolittle Diddy by the way). Joel’s reply made solid points about truth claims and deduction from axioms. Continue reading